<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bible Translations &#8211; Are They Trustworthy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveholtonline.org/2009/05/19/bible-translations-are-they-trustworthy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveholtonline.org/2009/05/19/bible-translations-are-they-trustworthy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson syakayuwa</title>
		<link>http://steveholtonline.org/2009/05/19/bible-translations-are-they-trustworthy/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wilson syakayuwa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveholtonline.org/?p=90#comment-79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is trustworthy and all should know this!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is trustworthy and all should know this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brownlee</title>
		<link>http://steveholtonline.org/2009/05/19/bible-translations-are-they-trustworthy/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Brownlee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveholtonline.org/?p=90#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome job Pastor Steve,

Really looking forward to part II.
Last Fall I had a discussion with a brother regarding the various translations, paraphrases, etc. Had some good dialogue. However, when I showed or tried to explain some differnces in how the NASB, NIV and others are interpreted, and how some scholars believe that some portions of Scripture should not be included with some of the chapters, like Mark 16. Some translations include the last half of the chapter, while others say that it is not in the older manuscripts. We did not see eye to eye on this.

Maybe if you would go over some of this type thing, it would be helpful.

Thanks again,

David Brownlee]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome job Pastor Steve,</p>
<p>Really looking forward to part II.<br />
Last Fall I had a discussion with a brother regarding the various translations, paraphrases, etc. Had some good dialogue. However, when I showed or tried to explain some differnces in how the NASB, NIV and others are interpreted, and how some scholars believe that some portions of Scripture should not be included with some of the chapters, like Mark 16. Some translations include the last half of the chapter, while others say that it is not in the older manuscripts. We did not see eye to eye on this.</p>
<p>Maybe if you would go over some of this type thing, it would be helpful.</p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>David Brownlee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

